Insights

/ Insights / Should PR lead brand building?

Free thinking from Grayling people

Should PR lead brand building?

30. Oktober 2015


There’s a huge land grab going on in our industry over who owns what in communications. A recent survey of Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) found that many believe that PR should not lead brand building. I disagree. Here’s why.

The road to truly integrated communications is proving combative. According to a recent survey of an admittedly small field of 56 US CMOs is telling: PR should stick to crisis communications, media relations and executive positioning and leave content and social to the marketing and advertising departments.

This siloing is not good for the industry and we in PR, who work in the perceptions business, need to change some in the industry’s perception of us.

Why PR should lead brand building

There seems to be a perception that persists that PR is (still) solely about influencer relations and reputation management. These are just components in an ever-widening brief including search and content, social media and community management, areas in which many ‘PR’ companies have excelled.

This is because these areas rely on people skills, storytelling capabilities and strong contacts with influential media that act as a catalyst for content spread.

Joined up government

No marketer is an island and the team is not an archipelago. This is why the smart PR consultancies have already migrated towards building integrated communications teams to work as a tight group.

For example, let’s look at crisis management. If marketing and advertising is not joined up with PR then you get the all-too-often seen situation where ads are launched into the public domain, cause a backlash, and PR is left to mop up the corporate reputation damage.

PR should be the filter, the editorial control, the last word, the bigger picture-ists.

Time to shake up the ‘Newsroom’

Another finding of the study was that CMOs rated their newsrooms as ‘overhyped’ – a bit of a kick in the teeth for PR. Maybe those who are unhappy with their newsrooms feel they’re out of date and not serving their purpose in the era of the Social Web and Social News.

Newsrooms nowadays should not be a long list of press releases, but a rich environment of press and blogger-friendly resources: biogs, photos, information, videos, podcasts – we should use all the tools at our disposal to convey our message and assist in that all-important end-goal of brand building.

Wake up call for PR

The small field of responders aside, this study should act as a call-to-arms for PR agencies. It’s indicative of how our work is perceived by a section of our own target audience, the people who hold increasing amounts of budget for the things we do - and the things we should.

We need to sell our integrated capabilities better.


Grayling Team

Letzte Blogbeiträge

12. Oktober 2017


Werden Unternehmen in der Krise noch gehört? – Ein Interview mit Martin Riecken

Eine der aktuellen Herausforderungen der Krisenkommunikation ist der Umgang mit Fake News. Diesem Thema gingen wir Mitte September 2017 in unserem Business Lunch in Frankfurt nach. Hier konnten sich...

Weiterlesen

9. Oktober 2017


Millennials stehen gesponserten Inhalten skeptisch gegenüber

Gesponserte Influencer-Postings oder -Videos gehören in unserer Gesellschaft zum Alltag, jedoch reichen Hashtags wie #sponsored oder #ad nicht mehr aus, um auf bezahlte Kooperationen zwischen...

Weiterlesen

29. September 2017


Influencer sind keine Werbebanner

Am 23. September fand das erste Influencer Marketing Camp in Hamburg statt. Elena Lindenzweig und Miriam Heimberg, beide Account Executives bei Grayling Deutschland in Frankfurt, waren für uns vor...

Weiterlesen