Insights

/ Insights / How not to handle a communication crisis

Free thinking from Grayling people

How not to handle a communication crisis

3rd July 2018


By Peter Kiragu, Grayling Kenya, 21.6.2018

A week ago, the Kenyan media was awash with news that a consignment of imported sugar had been nabbed contaminated with various components like copper, mercury, yeast and molds that are dangerously harmful if consumed.

According to wide media reports, accusing fingers have been pointed to one sugar processing company called West Kenya Sugar which packages the Kabras brand of the sweetener.

Since then, the company has received all manner of negative publicity with most noise, of course, coming from the social media.

The backlash has reached many households and most parents, at least judging from their social media posts, have vowed to stop the consumption of the commodity on fears of the serious repercussion that it portends.

All this time, West Kenya Sugar company has said nothing on the issue only coming out on Wednesday this week with a full-page statement in all the newspapers denying all the allegations and distancing themselves from the said imported consignment.

Communication experts believe this is too late. The damage seems to have been done if what is happening in my house, where a decision has been taken to boycott Kabras Sugar, can be taken as a case study. The sugar company has a serious communication crisis to deal with. How can they now convince the public that Kabras sugar on supermarket shelves meets all the requisite quality standards?

Various discussions on the issue on PR platforms points to the fact that the company did not have a PR or crisis management firm and had indeed been forced to hire one as an emergency. While I am not 100% sure about this, what is abundantly clear is that the company underestimated the crisis and its potential impact.

As communication professionals, there are valuable lessons that we can gather from this incident. To me, the main one is the speed at which we respond to a crisis. This is however dependent on the nature of the crisis, given that not all situations are to be responded to. But where a product on supermarket shelves is concerned, I think the response should be as fast as possible to remove any grain of doubt. Why for instance did the company take so long to distance itself from the seized consignment?

What other lessons can we learn from this incident? Drop me a message @peterkiragu or at@GraylingKe with your thoughts.

 


Grayling Team

Latest Insights

24th April 2019


Pan-European fish fingers

It is six weeks until the elections to the European Parliament. As we have discussed previously, the Czechs have never been keen European voters. This might be – among other things – because we...

Read More

17th April 2019


A better tomorrow for ICT and eGovernment?

A few days ago, Estonia’s eGovernment Academy released a new National Cyber Security Index. It came as a surprise to many that the Czech Republic was in pole position. In a very short period of...

Read More

28th March 2019


A bumpy ride for the electric future

The transport sector has been on the receiving end of environmental wrath for quite some time now, having been responsible for over 25% of CO2 emissions in the EU alone. To tackle this, the sector is...

Read More